|
| Welcome to Pewaukee Patriot | Friday, July 30 2010 @ 09:35 PM CDT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Tuesday, August 25 2009 @ 10:51 PM CDT Dale...I like your take on your current economic situation. Perhaps you should be running for school board given that they must have big balls to put forward a $25 MILLION spending plan for mostly play time activities during these economic hard times. And you guyz in the City are worried about being short a mil! Chump change by their standards.
Since the City has been on the low tax end for years as you have described, now the party is over and its time to jack your taxes to get in the real world and also to better achieve parity with our Village taxes. Our school board doesn't worry about taxes, after all, "its for the kidz". Tax parity would reduce a stumbling block for this merger stuff. Everyone's a winner! To put your tax increase thru successfully, all you need is some catchy idea that just tugs at ones heartstrings, and the wallets will open up and the money flows. How about an "Adopt a Road" program? Andy Mueller, Pewaukee Village
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Wednesday, August 26 2009 @ 09:40 AM CDT I have to agree with the earlier post. Have the bean counters been asleep for the past 7months?? At what point does a person "wake up" and realize, "whoa, we are almost 1million short"? Can the Sheriff honestly provide the same level of service to the Citizens of Pewaukee? The answer to that is "NO". Gone will be the days of seeing squads driving through your subdivision, gone will be well established programs keeping kids safe and working with Police Officers at a young age! Mom, I thought we had "Cops and Bobbers today, sorry son, the City decided to eliminate the Police Department". The PD will be at the forefront of your thoughts Dale? Maybe, the Officers, many with children that have fearlessly served this community through thick and thin in Pewaukee should be at the forfront of your mind. The children whose parents are suddenly going to be without jobs because the City of Pewaukee Common Council didnt want to raise taxes????!! Wow Dale, that is really nice to hear from a family man! When was the last time taxes were increased in Pewaukee? Maybe it is time to do so. To so matter of factly, (and that is the way this seems) describe your cost saving measure by reducing public safety is disappointing to say the least. I wonder why you (the common council) chose the PD to start the cost saving measures?? Can you shed some insight on that? You have a group of highly dedicated employess whose future is in your hands, and I hope THAT and not tax freezes is at the forefront of your mind. See you Thursday Dale!
Brian Fredericks President-City of Pewaukee Police Assoc.
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Wednesday, August 26 2009 @ 11:41 AM CDT Oh, Snap!
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Wednesday, August 26 2009 @ 07:25 PM CDT I am a City of Pewaukee resident.. I can not beleive that a City which just received an award for bieng the top City to reside in may not have it's own Police Department. Why don't we go to the County and contract the administrator position. We could also look at contracting with County Highway. I even beleive there is a County Park System that may possibly be interested in bidding out our park maintenance. The savings could be endless. We may even have the County Board of Supervisors quote us a bid on our Common Council. Then we could rename our City Pewaukee County. Wake up...
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Wednesday, August 26 2009 @ 09:56 PM CDT I believe the award was for the best MOST AFFORDABLE suburb to live in, not the best overall. Cheap is good, if quality doesn't matter. The crux is, more often than not, the quality is worth the extra money.
I suppose we could find out. The city could commission a study to see if we really measure up as the best overall. They are really good at funding studies.
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Thursday, August 27 2009 @ 01:30 PM CDT A little less hesteria would help. Under the circumstances I think it would be unreasonable, to the point ot negilance to not look at alternatives. Having said that, working with the village as an altrernative should also be looked at. Don't thnk anybody said fire the entire police staff, just yet.
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Thursday, October 08 2009 @ 09:36 PM CDT Fredricks, Get your facts straight. The Waukesha Sheriff's Department has been around much longer than the City of Pewaukee. The Sheriff's department is not only the chief lawenforcement agency in Waukesha County, but the best equipt and trained. Case in point.....the Oswalds. The town/city at that time and still today would never have had the manpower nor the skill to investigate that tragedy. Thanks to the Sheriff's department by stepping in and taking control of the investigation that both Oswalds are behind bars for life. No way could the police department then or even now do such an outstanding job.
So the answer to your first question is absolutly yes. And, by the way, would provide better services that we have now at a substantial savings. The savings come from trimming the fat from the overstaffed underqualified police department in place now.
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Friday, August 28 2009 @ 11:14 AM CDT Dale
I am a tax paying resident of the City of Pewaukee & I would pay more tax $ in a heart beat in order to have the current City of Pewaukee police dept continue police duties in the city. I believe it would be totally unacceptable to the majority of the City of Pewaukee residents to have the Waukesha Sheriff's dept perform these duties. I would think there would need to be a voting referendum in order to eliminate our local police dept. You need to figure out better ways to reduce costs. Regards, Tom Whalen
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Saturday, August 29 2009 @ 04:49 PM CDT The "Town" of Pewaukee pushed so hard to become a City several years
ago. Now the city is considering taking a step backward and getting rid of their police department. Time to start acting like the "City" they so badly wanted to become. I am not 100% but I believe the City of Pewaukee would be the only city in the entire state to contract police services.
[ Reply to This | # ]
08/27/2009 Presentation by Sheriff Trawicki
Authored by: Anonymous on
Sunday, August 30 2009 @ 09:36 AM CDT "Budget crisis", "budget short fall" etc,,,, No doubt the city is in a tough spot right now. However, cutting or eliminating police services is not the answer, (contracting would do just that).
How about the contingency founds? I know what "contingency founds" are for and I think this situation qualifies. Citizens dont mind raising taxes if its for the right reason. The City of Pewaukee residents could still have some of the lowest taxes around even if taxes were raised slightly. Here is an idea, raise taxes (we all know its coming anyways) and dip into the contigency founds. Use just enough to cover the "short fall" and prepare better for 2010. Anyone ever consider the amount of money that has been spent on the various studies over the last several years? How many "merger studies" have the taxpayers paid for over the years? These studies are not cheap but the City continually feels the need to pay Ruekert & Mielke losts of money? As we speak the City is paying attorneys to have state legislation passed to pave the way for the merger. But now the City wants to save money by getting rid of the PD. How about saving some money by not paying for any more studies and put a hold on the legislative efforts until you can pay your bills.
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Monday, August 31 2009 @ 02:25 PM CDT Since the common council, for some unknown reason, makes the ultimate decision in this process, it's important for all citizens of the City of Pewaukee to let their alderman and the mayor know their feelings. Here is the website for their contact information (from the City of Pewaukee website) - http://www.cityofpewaukee.us/elected_officials.php. I've heard many are not answering their phones. This is unacceptable. Our elected officials answer to us, not the other way around. Ultimately, shouldn't it be the citizens who decide whether or not they want their own police department?
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Monday, August 31 2009 @ 09:52 PM CDT With the exception of Alderman Kiser, every one of the Alderpeople & the Mayor have a city of Pewaukee e-mail address to contact them at. This blog has a link to the city website.
If you are calling your alderman(woman) or the Mayor during the day, remember most of them work at a paying job. Don't forget, we elect part time officials, but we employ full time people to run the day to day operations of the city. I have voiced my opinion to my Aldermen, and intend to attend the meeting when this comes up for a vote. We can cut many other costs before we revert to using the county for our policing. In a recent article I read, the county polices a number of communities. All of them have the word Town in front of their name. The people who run the City of Pewaukee (elected and employed) have got to accept that we have not been a town since 1998. They seem to be acting like college Freshmen, and experimenting with every new thing that comes their way. We're way past the grace period for acting like we have no clue what it means to be a city. We have a full time City Administrator and a City Attorney. The Bach settlement was chump change compared to what we compensate them . What kind of leadership have we hired to guide us towards a sucessful future? Those positions may be two that should be considered when budget cuts are being sought.
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Tuesday, September 01 2009 @ 09:15 AM CDT Since the police department appears to be on a full-front PR offensive, I
agree-- contact your alderman, and let them know that the police department doesn't speak for the people. Let's hear from both the village and the sherriff on what better options are available to more efficiently police the city. Then our elected officials can make a decision.
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Tuesday, September 01 2009 @ 11:03 AM CDT EVERYBODY! Contact your AlderPERSON (you're welcome, Cheri) and let them know you're full committed to playing their game! What game? How about a little game called "Scare Tactic".
You see, obviously the City is hurting for money. So instead of just raising taxes and hearing people complain that "its tough economic times, you can't raise taxes - that's Un-American and Un-Pewaukeean", the Common Council has threatened to knee-jerk. "Well, if we don't raise taxes, we're going to have to eliminate the Police Department", they say. So then we say "Noooo, don't eliminate the Police Department, raise taxes if you need to". And then the Common Council laughs quietly on the inside because they got to hear the words come out of the constituents' mouths. This is a very similar game to when a woman asks if she "looks fat in these jeans". You know she does, but you play the game anyway. So yes, taxes probably need to be raised. It would just have been easier to have done it the Man's way (direct, to the point by saying "we need to raise taxes") instead of the Woman's / Common Council way (indirectly, playing games by saying "sigh, I guess we'll have to eliminate the police department, snowplowing, etc if we don't get some money..."). Sincerely, Milton Bradley
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Tuesday, September 01 2009 @ 02:27 PM CDT I am glad to see people are finally looking at where the real problems lie. That would be directly at the top. The Administrator meddles in everyday trivial things that department heads could and should handle on their own, but when it comes to balancing the budget, or figuring out that we aren't going to have enough money to accomplish what needs to be done, then suddenly everyone's shorts are in a bundle and they start talking about eliminating entire departments. And lets not start small, let's jeopardize our public safety. I agree that we could save a lot more by eliminating all those ridiculous studies and frivolous attempts at changing the law.
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Tuesday, September 01 2009 @ 10:08 PM CDT I am not quite sure why the common counsil has the ultimate say in what happens to the PD considering they are the reason that the city has gotten to this point. Decisions of this nature should be voted upon by the PEOPLE of the City of Pewaukee not seven people who do not have the best interests of the residents in mind!
[ Reply to This | # ]
Contact your alderman!
Authored by: Anonymous on
Wednesday, September 02 2009 @ 10:19 AM CDT Whether the people make the choice for better, more efficient police
services or the council does, it needs to be done.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Why were projections for the Building Services revenue increased in the 2009 Budget? Even last summer, building had ground to a halt, and the majority of economic experts predicted that it would be a long time before it recovered. That account is down about $200,000 in revenue. Is there someone/something that can be reduced in that budget for 2010? How many employees does this department have? Are they needed at this time?
(2) Right now, the city is approximately $1 Million short for the 2009 budget year. Why did it take our Administrator until June to figure out that revenue was down by $300K in Traffic fines and Building services? Aren't those revenues tallied every month? Do members of the CC see them when they approve the accounts payable? It would seem reasonable that if you get copies of the bills you should also see copies of the revenue generated by the departments. If money isn't coming in how can you authorize paying it out?
(3) If we are willing to look at contracting with the County for Police services, why did the CC flat out refuse to hear out a contract option from the village a few months ago? Seems to me it was because we had already decided that we should keep our own force. If we are going to visit options, then I think we should also reconsider contracting with the village.